Sapling Week 2 Question 3
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Sapling Week 2 Question 3
For this question, the Ka = 8.40x10^-4. When solving this problem, I decided to use approximation, even though the Ka was at 10^-4. I got a percent ionization that was larger than 5%, so I went back to solve the problem with the quadratic formula. I got essentially the same answer as my approximation. Would this be an exception to making sure x is less than 5% when using approximations or are there other factors that affect the percent ionization?
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:02 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Sapling Week 2 Question 3
hey! for this question I don't think you can use an approximation because the 8 in 0.0008 would technically make it round to 0.001, which is greater than 10^-4, the cut off discussed in lecture. Instead, I used the quadratic formula to get an x of 0.0092, and then for the percent ionization I divided this number by the M given in the problem. I'm not sure if this answers your question completely but hope it helps!
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:57 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Sapling Week 2 Question 3
rather than approximating, make an ICE table, and use the Ka value and equation to solve for your x value.
Then, take [H+]/[HA] at equilibrium x 100% for percent ionization.
Then, take [H+]/[HA] at equilibrium x 100% for percent ionization.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:49 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Sapling Week 2 Question 3
I did the same thing when I first did the problem, but Kaylee is right, your value has to be less than 1.0 * 10^-4 for the method to work. So if the first number is greater than 1.0 it will not be small enough to ignore in your ICE box final equation. I find that just for my own thought process, I only use this method if its =10^-5 or less. But you can always check the percent ionization to see if there is something you made a mistake on.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Re: Sapling Week 2 Question 3
I did both an approximation and without it, but got almost the same answer. Sapling only accepts the non-approximated with like 4 decimal places
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:43 pm
Re: Sapling Week 2 Question 3
I had a similar issue! I have the same problem as you, but I think I will try it with the approximation and without. I know the professor said something about a cutoff at 10 to the 4th, but I don't know if that applies to sapling as well.
Return to “Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests