HOTDOG #12 part B
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
HOTDOG #12 part B
I don't understand the values for the temperature change used for the first enthalpy changes where glucose and oxygenate added together? Where did 11.3 for glucose and 16.3 for oxygen come from?
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:18 am
Re: HOTDOG #12 part B
The problem provides the change in enthalpy at 200°C, so the first step is to heat up the reactants from 37°C to 200°C. This is why the change in temperature equals 163°C. I do not see any values of 11.3 or 16.3.
Re: HOTDOG #12 part B
I keep plugging in (1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163) but not getting the correct answer?
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:18 am
Re: HOTDOG #12 part B
When I use the equation you provided, I get 64,482.8 J, which equals the answer provided in the review session.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am
Re: HOTDOG #12 part B
(1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163) only gives you part of the answer as you need to heat it up from 37 to 200, then use the DeltaHrxn then cool it down from 200 to 37.
DeltaH1=(1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163)
DeltaH2=-2756kJ
DeltaH3=(6)(37.1)(-163)+(6)(75.3)(-163)
DeltaH1+DeltaH2+DeltaH3 Should give you the answer -2801kJ ->2.8*10^3 kJ (sig figs)
DeltaH1=(1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163)
DeltaH2=-2756kJ
DeltaH3=(6)(37.1)(-163)+(6)(75.3)(-163)
DeltaH1+DeltaH2+DeltaH3 Should give you the answer -2801kJ ->2.8*10^3 kJ (sig figs)
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:27 am
Re: HOTDOG #12 part B
Kevin Tang 4L wrote:(1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163) only gives you part of the answer as you need to heat it up from 37 to 200, then use the DeltaHrxn then cool it down from 200 to 37.
DeltaH1=(1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163)
DeltaH2=-2756kJ
DeltaH3=(6)(37.1)(-163)+(6)(75.3)(-163)
DeltaH1+DeltaH2+DeltaH3 Should give you the answer -2801kJ ->2.8*10^3 kJ (sig figs)
Why is the temperature for delta h3 negative? Since delta h1 is the enthalpy of the reactants, why isn't delta h1 negative?
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am
Re: HOTDOG #12 part B
Aurbal Popal wrote:Kevin Tang 4L wrote:(1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163) only gives you part of the answer as you need to heat it up from 37 to 200, then use the DeltaHrxn then cool it down from 200 to 37.
DeltaH1=(1)(219.2)(163)+(6)(29.4)(163)
DeltaH2=-2756kJ
DeltaH3=(6)(37.1)(-163)+(6)(75.3)(-163)
DeltaH1+DeltaH2+DeltaH3 Should give you the answer -2801kJ ->2.8*10^3 kJ (sig figs)
Why is the temperature for delta h3 negative? Since delta h1 is the enthalpy of the reactants, why isn't delta h1 negative?
The reaction first goes from body temp (37C) to 200C for delta h1, meaning Tf-Ti would be 163. Delta h2 is at 200C. Delta h3 would then have to come back down to body temp, meaning the change in T would be 37C-200C = -163.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests