5 posts • Page 1 of 1
I drew in another potential constitutional isomer to the right of the book answers on number 1.23, can someone explain why this does not count as an answer? Why can't the double bond be at the end right before the substituent?
Cindy Chen_2I wrote:What you draw is the same isomer as the one right next to it.
If you try to name it, you'll see that they're both named 2-Methyl-1-butene
I do see that now, since that is the case, could my drawing potentially be described as geometric isomer though? Would it be trans (E)?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest