300 vs 300.  [ENDORSED]

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Rita Dang 3D
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am

300 vs 300.

Postby Rita Dang 3D » Sat Oct 28, 2017 1:58 pm

Just to make sure. 300 has only 1 sig fig. And 300. has 3 sig figs right?

Nancy Dinh 2J
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am

Re: 300 vs 300.

Postby Nancy Dinh 2J » Sat Oct 28, 2017 2:58 pm

Yup! :)

skalvakota2H
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am

Re: 300 vs 300.  [ENDORSED]

Postby skalvakota2H » Sat Oct 28, 2017 3:00 pm

Yes, the zeros in 300 are not considered for significant figures but merely space holders, which gives 300 only 1 significant figure.

By adding the decimal at the end, the zeros serve as additional measurement decisions which makes the zeros significant, which gives 300. 3 significant figures; note that scientific notation is used for this purpose, which would yield 3.00 x 10^2

Amy Zheng 2l
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am

Re: 300 vs 300.

Postby Amy Zheng 2l » Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm

yep. if there's a period than all number to the left of it is counted as sig figs

Jesus Rodriguez 1J
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:00 am

Re: 300 vs 300.

Postby Jesus Rodriguez 1J » Sun Oct 29, 2017 5:17 pm

Yes, 300. has 3 sig figs because of the decimal which makes the zeros significant. Whereas the zeros in 300 are just seen as placeholders.

annie_finneran_1K
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:02 am

Re: 300 vs 300.

Postby annie_finneran_1K » Sat Apr 07, 2018 5:00 pm

so the decimal is what sig figs revolves around correct? aka when in doubt just look and see the importance of a decimal?

Bryan Jiang 1F
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:03 am
Contact:

Re: 300 vs 300.

Postby Bryan Jiang 1F » Sun Apr 08, 2018 7:10 pm

annie_finneran_1K wrote:so the decimal is what sig figs revolves around correct? aka when in doubt just look and see the importance of a decimal?

Yes, it could help thinking of sig figs like that when looking for the decimal and the numbers that come before it. However, keep in mind situations where numbers only come after the decimal, such as in 0.003. This number would have one sig fig. A number like 0.00300 would have three sig figs, even though the decimal is followed by two zeros before the sig figs. Those zeros function just like the placeholder zeros in a number like 300 (300 with no decimal).

Isobel Tweedt 1E
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:05 am

Re: 300 vs 300.

Postby Isobel Tweedt 1E » Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:55 pm

1. non zero = significant digit
1.234 has 4

2. zeros between two significant digits = significant digit
1.002 has 4

3. leading zeros = not significant digits
0.003 has 1

4. zeros following significant digits and a decimal = significant digits
300.0 has 4
0.0030 has 2

5. trailing zeros to the right of significant digits without a decimal = not significant digits
300 has 1

MinyoungHong_1L
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:03 am

Re: 300 vs 300.

Postby MinyoungHong_1L » Sat May 05, 2018 5:52 pm

Dr. Lavelle's link on the class website explaining significant figures is helpful in understanding significant figures. Additionally, I found this website explained the concept pretty well. http://chemistry.bd.psu.edu/jircitano/sigfigs.html


Return to “Significant Figures”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest