Just to clarify...
400 is different from 400. in terms of sig figs right?
I'm under the impression that 400 is 1 sig fig and 400. is 3 sig figs because there is a decimal point after the 0.
Is this correct?
Sig Figs
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2019 12:16 am
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:20 am
Re: Sig Figs
Yes! You are correct. Furthermore, scientific notation could potentially be used to make it more clear that you answer is written with a certain number of sig figs. For instance, 400 could be written as 4.00 x 10^2. This may be preferable to writing "400." in some cases since the decimal may be easily missed by someone looking over your work.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:22 am
Re: Sig Figs
For better reference, here are some more rules:
1. Non zero digits are always significant.
2. Zeros between 2 significant digits are significant.
3. Trailing zeros and final zero are only significant in the decimal part.
4. For numbers less than 1 like in 0.05, the 0 before the decimal point is significant but the one after is not, because they are just place holders.
5. For whole numbers, leading and trailing zeros are not significant.
1. Non zero digits are always significant.
2. Zeros between 2 significant digits are significant.
3. Trailing zeros and final zero are only significant in the decimal part.
4. For numbers less than 1 like in 0.05, the 0 before the decimal point is significant but the one after is not, because they are just place holders.
5. For whole numbers, leading and trailing zeros are not significant.
Return to “Significant Figures”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests