Sig Figs

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

ASetlur_1G
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:17 am

Sig Figs

Postby ASetlur_1G » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:46 pm

Just to clarify...

400 is different from 400. in terms of sig figs right?
I'm under the impression that 400 is 1 sig fig and 400. is 3 sig figs because there is a decimal point after the 0.

Is this correct?

rachelle1K
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2019 12:16 am

Re: Sig Figs

Postby rachelle1K » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:49 pm

Yes that is correct! A decimal implies that the zeros before it are significant.

William Francis 2E
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:20 am

Re: Sig Figs

Postby William Francis 2E » Thu Oct 03, 2019 11:11 pm

Yes! You are correct. Furthermore, scientific notation could potentially be used to make it more clear that you answer is written with a certain number of sig figs. For instance, 400 could be written as 4.00 x 10^2. This may be preferable to writing "400." in some cases since the decimal may be easily missed by someone looking over your work.

Keerthana Sivathasan 2E
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:22 am

Re: Sig Figs

Postby Keerthana Sivathasan 2E » Fri Oct 04, 2019 8:56 pm

For better reference, here are some more rules:
1. Non zero digits are always significant.
2. Zeros between 2 significant digits are significant.
3. Trailing zeros and final zero are only significant in the decimal part.
4. For numbers less than 1 like in 0.05, the 0 before the decimal point is significant but the one after is not, because they are just place holders.
5. For whole numbers, leading and trailing zeros are not significant.


Return to “Significant Figures”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests