Nucleophiles
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am
Nucleophiles
When determining the strength of nucleophiles, does it depend on polarization or is there some other way of determing which nucleophile is stronger?
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am
Re: Nucleophiles
I think you can also count the number of lone pairs. The more lone pairs, the stronger the nucleophile (because it has more electrons).
Hope this helps!
Hope this helps!
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am
Re: Nucleophiles
Yes I believe you look at the number of lone pairs when this number is different between two species. However, if they have the same number of lone pairs, then you would look at polarizability.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am
Re: Nucleophiles
Nucleophilic strength decreases going across a period.
e.g. R3C- > R2N- >RO- > F-
It increases going down a group, due to the polarizability effect.
e.g. F- < Cl- < Br- < I-
e.g. R3C- > R2N- >RO- > F-
It increases going down a group, due to the polarizability effect.
e.g. F- < Cl- < Br- < I-
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am
Re: Nucleophiles
Do lone pairs take priority over relative position on periodic table?
For example, would an element with less polarizability still be more nucleophilic than an element one down its column if it had more lone pairs?
For example, would an element with less polarizability still be more nucleophilic than an element one down its column if it had more lone pairs?
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am
Re: Nucleophiles
I think that elements in the same group (column) would have the same number of valence electrons and, therefore, the same number of lone pairs, if any.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest