FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session  [ENDORSED]

Any general non-science questions (software questions/problems, etc.,) and class announcements.

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Chem_Mod
Posts: 17238
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
Has upvoted: 367 times

FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session  [ENDORSED]

Postby Chem_Mod » Sun Dec 02, 2018 5:35 pm

The title is called "Churro" so that you can search "Churro" and easily find this post!

This is your favorite UA, Lyndon Bui, and I have created many practice problems for your final. The questions are modeled after previous test and exam questions, but it may not have everything you need to know. This covers only material after the midterm. I already covered pre-midterm material in a midterm review session.


Please complete these problems before my review session. My review session this quarter (Fall18) will be Friday, Dec 7, 4-6:50pm, in Haines 39.
I will go over each problem in detail during my review session. The answers, but not full solutions or work, will be posted here at this post after the review session. Any errors in the test will be posted below as well. If you have questions, please reply to this post and I will answer them if another student does not.

Printed copies will NOT be provided at the review session.

Link to Download Problems: Problems no longer available. Quarter has ended. See Course website and syllabus for most up-to-date material.
***This is not indicative of the structure, length, or format of the actual final. Treat these as extra practice problems. ***

Errors: #34 should say "1.0L Flask instead of 1L Flask"

Link for Answers: No Longer Available

Happy Studying and Good Luck!
-Lyndon Bui, UA

Phil Timoteo 1K
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:05 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Phil Timoteo 1K » Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:53 pm

Thank you so much!

Sydney Takeda 2I
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Sydney Takeda 2I » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:04 pm

bless your heart for these practice problems and review sessions

Luis_Yepez_1F
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:18 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Luis_Yepez_1F » Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:17 pm

Thank you so much for providing us with study material :D

ElliotPourdavoud 1A
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby ElliotPourdavoud 1A » Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:47 pm

Thank you very much for this!

yaosamantha4F
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:29 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby yaosamantha4F » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:49 pm

Thank you so much for these problems!

michellebui_3L
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby michellebui_3L » Mon Dec 03, 2018 3:49 pm

Best SEA Admit brother ever!

Karla_Ocampo 4E
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:01 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Karla_Ocampo 4E » Tue Dec 04, 2018 11:56 pm

Thank you very much!!

Jasmine Reddy DIS 1E
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Jasmine Reddy DIS 1E » Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:22 pm

Thank you so much for all that you do!

Leela_Mohan3L
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Leela_Mohan3L » Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:38 pm

Thank you! Does the compound in number 31 have a net charge?

Kevin Tang 4L
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kevin Tang 4L » Wed Dec 05, 2018 3:20 pm

Leela_Mohan3L wrote:Thank you! Does the compound in number 31 have a net charge?


[Ni (NH3)5 NO2]^+2
Because the Nickel has a 3+ charge and the NO2 has a 1- charge, it brings it to a net charge of 2+.
NH3 has no charge.

I hope this helps.
Please correct me if I made a mistake. Thanks

Leela_Mohan3L
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Leela_Mohan3L » Wed Dec 05, 2018 3:43 pm

Kevin Tang 4E wrote:
Leela_Mohan3L wrote:Thank you! Does the compound in number 31 have a net charge?


[Ni (NH3)5 NO2]^+2
Because the Nickel has a 3+ charge and the NO2 has a 1- charge, it brings it to a net charge of 2+.
NH3 has no charge.

I hope this helps.
Please correct me if I made a mistake. Thanks


That's what I was thinking as well. So then the compound name would have to have "ion" at the end, right?

Thanks!

sallina_yehdego 2E
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby sallina_yehdego 2E » Wed Dec 05, 2018 4:50 pm

THANK YOU!!!!

Kenan Kherallah 2C
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kenan Kherallah 2C » Wed Dec 05, 2018 5:37 pm

Hey guys can someone help me with question 21, I really dont know how to approach this since I just get a formal charge of +2 in total for the ligands which doesnt seem right

Avery Zuelch 1D
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:18 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Avery Zuelch 1D » Wed Dec 05, 2018 8:34 pm

Thank you!! Your sessions and review problems are always so helpful!!

Chem_Mod
Posts: 17238
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
Has upvoted: 367 times

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Chem_Mod » Wed Dec 05, 2018 8:41 pm

Kenan Kherallah 1A wrote:Hey guys can someone help me with question 21, I really dont know how to approach this since I just get a formal charge of +2 in total for the ligands which doesnt seem right


I will go over this in detail on Friday! -Lyndon

But for now.. think about how you would determine the oxidation state of a transition metal for a simpler complex then apply the same concepts to this larger molecule.

Vana Mirzakhani 3I
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Vana Mirzakhani 3I » Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:04 pm

Thank you so much for having taken the time to create a review packet for us Lyndon! Appreciate it!

Daniel Bowen 3I
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Daniel Bowen 3I » Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:11 pm

For question 34, once I have the Molarity of both compounds how do I find the pH with the two Molarities of HCl and CaO?

kamalkolluri
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby kamalkolluri » Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:51 pm

Daniel Bowen 3I wrote:For question 34, once I have the Molarity of both compounds how do I find the pH with the two Molarities of HCl and CaO?

I'm not completely sure if this is right but, for #34, I did the neutralization rxn between HCl and CaO. One of them is limiting, so if you use all of it up, you form water. The excess that's left over you can use to find the pH.

Kirsty Star 2H
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kirsty Star 2H » Wed Dec 05, 2018 10:00 pm

How do we know the shape of a coordination compound? Does it have to do with the number of bonded ligands?

Elena Maneffa 1E
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:27 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Elena Maneffa 1E » Wed Dec 05, 2018 10:06 pm

Thank you so much for all your help. This is extremely appreciated.

504999383
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby 504999383 » Wed Dec 05, 2018 11:47 pm

Thanks Lyndon you're a real one!

josephyim1L
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:15 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby josephyim1L » Thu Dec 06, 2018 1:38 am

how might one solve question 34? Should the overall concentration be found or is it only necessary to find the concentration of HCL is 1 Liter of water?

Ashley Odibo Dis3E
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:03 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Ashley Odibo Dis3E » Thu Dec 06, 2018 8:11 am

Thank you! This is really appreciated.

Chem_Mod
Posts: 17238
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
Has upvoted: 367 times

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Chem_Mod » Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:14 pm

josephyim1H wrote:how might one solve question 34? Should the overall concentration be found or is it only necessary to find the concentration of HCL is 1 Liter of water?


I will go over this in detail on Friday (tomorrow) -Lyndon

As a hint, remember that you only look at Hydronium ions and hydroxide ions when determining pH or pOH. Acids generate hydronium ions while bases generate hydroxide ions. The two neutralize each other.

Angela Cong 3C
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Angela Cong 3C » Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:17 pm

Thank you so much to my favorite UA. I greatly appreciate your practice problems!

Carolina Lechuga
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Carolina Lechuga » Thu Dec 06, 2018 3:17 pm

These practice worksheets are my fave !! Everyone I know is going to your review session! You really clear things up.

Carolina Lechuga
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Carolina Lechuga » Thu Dec 06, 2018 4:03 pm

Can anyone help me with the bond angle for number one ?? I have difficulty determining bond angles so for this problem what would it be and why?

Kevin Tang 4L
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kevin Tang 4L » Thu Dec 06, 2018 5:09 pm

Carolina Lechuga wrote:Can anyone help me with the bond angle for number one ?? I have difficulty determining bond angles so for this problem what would it be and why?


This angle will be slightly less than 120 degrees. This is because it is sp2 hybridized, and has a VSEPR formula of AX2E the shape is bent. The lone pair repels the oxygens more than a bonding pair, making the angle less than 120 degrees.

Kunseo Yook 2E
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kunseo Yook 2E » Thu Dec 06, 2018 5:36 pm

Thank you for the problems!

1K Kevin
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby 1K Kevin » Thu Dec 06, 2018 11:04 pm

The real mvp here

Dayna Pham 1I
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am
Been upvoted: 3 times

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Dayna Pham 1I » Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:14 pm

thanks :P

Jayde Felix 4H
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Jayde Felix 4H » Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:38 pm

Thanks Lyndon you're the best

MichaelMoreno2G
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby MichaelMoreno2G » Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:00 pm

Thank you for this! The one for the midterm really helped out and I hope this one does too. What will be the final topic covered during the review session?

ariellasarkissian_3H
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby ariellasarkissian_3H » Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:02 pm

Thank you so much!

Elle_Mendelson_2K
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Elle_Mendelson_2K » Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:15 pm

Thank you Lyndon! Is this the same level of difficulty as the final will be?

Elle_Mendelson_2K
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Elle_Mendelson_2K » Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:15 pm

Will someone please explain number 20?

Sydni Stewart
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:29 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Sydni Stewart » Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:41 pm

You are a chemistry saint. Thank you.

Elle_Mendelson_2K
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Elle_Mendelson_2K » Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:42 pm

Will someone please explain 22

Karla_Ocampo 4E
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:01 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Karla_Ocampo 4E » Fri Dec 07, 2018 5:07 pm

Hey guys! Im at another review for another final *crying emoji* , can someone PLEASE send me pictures of their notes?? I would greatly appreciate it!! my email is itzkar1@g.ucla.edu

AustinGrove3B
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:23 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby AustinGrove3B » Fri Dec 07, 2018 5:11 pm

Elle_Mendelson_4I wrote:Will someone please explain 22


Myoglobin has one heme group, which is what that Fe N structure is. Each heme group can hold one oxygen, therefore myoglobin holds 1 oxygen. Hemoglobin has 4 heme groups.

AustinGrove3B
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:23 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby AustinGrove3B » Fri Dec 07, 2018 5:13 pm

Elle_Mendelson_4I wrote:Will someone please explain number 20?


Iron actually likes to have 6 bonds... coordination number 6. This Fe in the structure is bound to 4 nitrogens, but will also bind to a histine group and a structure that binds to oxygen, creating 6 bonds. 6 bonds creates an octahedral structure.

Daniel Bowen 3I
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Daniel Bowen 3I » Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:44 pm

Can someone please explain 33 part C?

Meachelle_Lum_1I
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

33c

Postby Meachelle_Lum_1I » Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:47 pm

For 33c, since we have a weak base, we will have less OH since it doesn’t completely dissociate. However, since less OH means more H3O, this means less pOH should mean more pH. Why did Lyndon say lower pH instead?

Daniel Bowen 3I
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Daniel Bowen 3I » Fri Dec 07, 2018 7:18 pm

Will someone please explain question 40 part B and C

Lina Petrossian 1D
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:16 am

Re: 33c

Postby Lina Petrossian 1D » Fri Dec 07, 2018 7:58 pm

Meachelle_Lum_3C wrote:For 33c, since we have a weak base, we will have less OH since it doesn’t completely dissociate. However, since less OH means more H3O, this means less pOH should mean more pH. Why did Lyndon say lower pH instead?

More H30 means more proton concentration, meaning a lower (more acidic) pH value.

Lina Petrossian 1D
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:16 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Lina Petrossian 1D » Fri Dec 07, 2018 7:58 pm

When will answers be posted?

MichelleRamirez_2F
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby MichelleRamirez_2F » Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:06 pm

Can someone explain why hemogrlobin is tetradentrate but cisplatin is monodentrate?

Ryan Danis 1J
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:18 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Ryan Danis 1J » Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:48 pm

On question 38, how come the LDF’s are the determining factor instead of dipole-dipole in determining the boiling point?

Shivangi_2J
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:15 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Shivangi_2J » Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:49 pm

Michelle Ramirez_4A wrote:Can someone explain why hemogrlobin is tetradentrate but cisplatin is monodentrate?


hemoglobin and cisplatin are not ligands, so they aren't any kind of "dentate." We only describe ligands as being bidentate, tridentate, etc.

KatelinTanjuaquio 1L
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby KatelinTanjuaquio 1L » Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:11 pm

Ryan Danis 1K wrote:On question 38, how come the LDF’s are the determining factor instead of dipole-dipole in determining the boiling point?


H2Se has stronger London dispersion forces, while H2S has stronger dipole-dipole forces. However, because we are given that H2Se has a higher boiling point, all we know that is that the london dispersion forces were stronger and thus dominated.

KatelinTanjuaquio 1L
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby KatelinTanjuaquio 1L » Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:14 pm

Daniel Bowen 3I wrote:Will someone please explain question 40 part B and C


For part B:
We would expect ozone to have two bond lengths are the same. This is because it is a resonance structure. In resonance structures, the bond lengths are the same--the average of its bond lengths.

For part C:
O2 would have the strongest bond because it has a double bond and thus is shorter.

Nicolle Fernandez 1E
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Nicolle Fernandez 1E » Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:43 pm

Thanks! When are the answers going to be posted?

Leslie Cheng 4B
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:29 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Leslie Cheng 4B » Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:15 pm

On question 21, can someone explain why Fe has an oxidation state of +2? I get that this is because of the nitrogens, but how do the nitrogens come to have a charge of -2? I was trying to calculate the formal charge but kept getting a positive charge on the nitrogens, not a negative charge.

Joussie Camacho 4I
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:16 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Joussie Camacho 4I » Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:06 pm

Leslie Cheng 4B wrote:On question 21, can someone explain why Fe has an oxidation state of +2? I get that this is because of the nitrogens, but how do the nitrogens come to have a charge of -2? I was trying to calculate the formal charge but kept getting a positive charge on the nitrogens, not a negative charge.


This is because we are told that the overall charge of the molecule is neutral. So if the nitrogens all have a charge of -2, then Fe has to have a charge of +2 in order for the overall charge to be 0. In order to find the charge of the nitrogen ligand, you have to look at each nitrogen when it is not bound to Fe (so you replace each n-Fe bond with a lone pair) and also fill in the rest of the lone pair necessary for each nitrogen to have a full octet (again, while unbound). Once you do this, you can find the formal charge of each nitrogen. There are 4 nitrogens, 2 of them had two pairs of lone pair electrons and 2 single bonds, so those had a formal charge of -1 (5-6 = -1) each, and the other two nitrogens had one pair of lone electrons and one single bond and one double bond, so those had a formal charge of 0 (5-5 = 0). The whole ring around Fe is 1 single ligand because it's all connected, so if we add all of the nitrogen charges together, the charge of the ligand is -2.

This is really hard to explain without the picture but I hope it helped somehow!

Destiny Diaz 4D
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Destiny Diaz 4D » Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:51 pm

Thank you for your help ! When will the answers be posted ? :)

CaminaB_1D
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby CaminaB_1D » Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:11 am

can someone explain 23 and why porphyrin ligand is tetradentrate

isarose0
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:15 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby isarose0 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:35 am

CaminaB_1D wrote:can someone explain 23 and why porphyrin ligand is tetradentrate

Porphyrin is tetradentate because there are four binding sites of the ligand (the four N's in the diagram) to the Fe. The prefix to the dentate has to do with how many binding sites there are for a single ligand.

Chem_Mod
Posts: 17238
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
Has upvoted: 367 times

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Chem_Mod » Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:38 am

Answers are posted now at the top. Scroll up:)

Richard Ku 4H
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:16 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Richard Ku 4H » Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:30 am

Thank you so much for this!

Reese - Dis 1G
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:15 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Reese - Dis 1G » Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:23 am

Can someone explain 27? I thought you only added -ate when the compound was negative.

ariellasarkissian_3H
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby ariellasarkissian_3H » Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:10 pm

Can someone explain the bond angles in number 18?

ariellasarkissian_3H
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby ariellasarkissian_3H » Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:19 pm

How do we determine the hybridization on the lone pair? For example, if O is bonded to two atoms and has two lone pairs, wouldn't it just be sp3 or is there another specific notation for the lone pair I am missing?

yaosamantha4F
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:29 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby yaosamantha4F » Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:08 pm

Thank you for posting these!

Esther Lee 4H
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:29 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Esther Lee 4H » Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:57 pm

thank you!!

Chris Freking 2G
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:29 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Chris Freking 2G » Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:06 pm

Reese - Dis 1G wrote:Can someone explain 27? I thought you only added -ate when the compound was negative.


If K2 has a +2 charge, then [Ni(CN)4] must have a -2 charge since the overall compound is neutral. It's called "nickelate" because the compound in the brackets has the -2 charge.

Venya Vaddi 1L
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am
Been upvoted: 2 times

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Venya Vaddi 1L » Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:16 pm

ariellasarkissian_3H wrote:How do we determine the hybridization on the lone pair? For example, if O is bonded to two atoms and has two lone pairs, wouldn't it just be sp3 or is there another specific notation for the lone pair I am missing?


In the same way that you do when determining shape, count the regions of electron density. If O has two lone pairs and two bonding pairs, the total number of regions of electron density is 4, so the hybridization is sp3. There are 4 sp3 orbitals formed: two of them hold one lone pair each, and the remaining two are used in the bonding pairs.

Kelsey Li 3B
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kelsey Li 3B » Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:47 pm

thank you for the final review it really helped!

BenJohnson1H
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby BenJohnson1H » Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:25 pm

So when calculating the pH of an acid and base reaction, would you need to put both into one equation or write equations separately for each?

904837647
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby 904837647 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:39 pm

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! THIS IS DEFINITELY A HUGE HELP!!

904837647
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby 904837647 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:42 pm

Will the final be similar to this practice final?

Sydney Takeda 2I
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Sydney Takeda 2I » Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:54 pm

For #31, would it also be correct to put NO2 in the complex or does it have to be ONO?

Celine Hoh 2L
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:28 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Celine Hoh 2L » Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:57 pm

Thank you! Does anyone know which other TAs or UAs post worksheets as well (besides Lyndon and Karen)?

Ahmet_Dikyurt_3L
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:23 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Ahmet_Dikyurt_3L » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:07 pm

Can someone explain 33b?

Simran Rai 4E
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Simran Rai 4E » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:12 pm

These practice problems and review sessions are so helpful. Thank you Lyndon!

Imelda Mena 3I
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Imelda Mena 3I » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:18 pm

ariellasarkissian_3H wrote:Can someone explain the bond angles in number 18?


For number 18, you have to look at the structure with all bonds, atoms, and lone pairs to make it easy to see what is going on. Once you have a structure that includes every thing see what shapes you have for each atom and from the shape determine what the different bond angles would be. For example, the less than 109.5 degrees comes from the bent shape of the Oxygen with the two lone pairs and two Carbon atoms attached to it. The 109.5 degrees angle comes from the tetrahedral shape of the CH3 at the far right of the molecule. The 120 degrees can be seen in any of the trigonal planar shapes, and lastly the 180 degrees is from the CN bond that is composed of a triple bond and is therefore linear.

Hope this helps!

Imelda Mena 3I
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Imelda Mena 3I » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:21 pm

Sydney Takeda 1G wrote:For #31, would it also be correct to put NO2 in the complex or does it have to be ONO?


I would say it has to be ONO, nitrito, because if you write NO2 that can be mistaken with nitro. Which seem similar but are not because the central atom for each differentiates.

Imelda Mena 3I
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Imelda Mena 3I » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:26 pm

Ahmet_Dikyurt_3L wrote:Can someone explain 33b?


For this question it's crucial to realize that NaOH is a strong base and therefore we know that it completely dissociates. Once we have identified this, we know that 0.55M NaOH will produce 0.55 OH- because it completely dissociates. From here all that is left is plug in the concentration of the OH- into the pOH formula, , and then once you get the pOH which in this problem is = 0.2596 you use this to get pH by using, and get a pH of 13.740.

For this problem also remember that the significant figure rules are different.

Simran Athwal-Dis 3A
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Simran Athwal-Dis 3A » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:30 pm

Thank you so much, this was so helpful.

905085650
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:19 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby 905085650 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:34 pm

Thank you for your help this quarter!!!

Lisa Werner 2F
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Lisa Werner 2F » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:35 pm

thank you so much!

bonnie_schmitz_1F
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby bonnie_schmitz_1F » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:52 pm

For question 18, I'm having trouble finding the 180˚ bond. Which bond would it be?

Krista Mercado 1B
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Krista Mercado 1B » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:55 pm

Thank you so much for the final review and practice problems!

Kathryn 1F
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:19 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kathryn 1F » Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:01 pm

Imelda Mena 3I wrote:
Sydney Takeda 1G wrote:For #31, would it also be correct to put NO2 in the complex or does it have to be ONO?


I would say it has to be ONO, nitrito, because if you write NO2 that can be mistaken with nitro. Which seem similar but are not because the central atom for each differentiates.


I think we should specify ONO-, but doesn't both NO2- and ONO- had the same lewis structure (with N as central), but the difference was what atom was bound to the metal, with N binding for NO2- and O binding for ONO-? I got this looking at the "naming coordination compounds" page on lavelle's website

LeannaPhan14BDis1D
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby LeannaPhan14BDis1D » Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:16 pm

this was really helpful and so was the review session thank you!

yuetao4k
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:27 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby yuetao4k » Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:20 pm

Thank you for the churro review! I also really liked garlic bread(:

Kathryn 1F
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:19 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kathryn 1F » Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:27 pm

Can someone explain 41d - how many atoms in thymine could form a hydrogen bond. The answer is 4 but I only see 2--on either oxygen. Where are the other 2?

Imelda Mena 3I
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Imelda Mena 3I » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:26 pm

Kathryn 3D wrote:
Imelda Mena 3I wrote:
Sydney Takeda 1G wrote:For #31, would it also be correct to put NO2 in the complex or does it have to be ONO?


I would say it has to be ONO, nitrito, because if you write NO2 that can be mistaken with nitro. Which seem similar but are not because the central atom for each differentiates.


I think we should specify ONO-, but doesn't both NO2- and ONO- had the same lewis structure (with N as central), but the difference was what atom was bound to the metal, with N binding for NO2- and O binding for ONO-? I got this looking at the "naming coordination compounds" page on lavelle's website


Yes, you are right! I messed up, I did NOT mean to say that the Lewis structure was different sorry for the confusion! The difference is the atom to which the metal will bind to.

Imelda Mena 3I
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Imelda Mena 3I » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:27 pm

Kathryn 3D wrote:Can someone explain 41d - how many atoms in thymine could form a hydrogen bond. The answer is 4 but I only see 2--on either oxygen. Where are the other 2?


The other two come from the two Nitrogens in the structure.

Daniela Alvarado 3B
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Daniela Alvarado 3B » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:33 pm

for #24, why can't we find the oxidation state of Fe by finding the nitrogen' formal charges while attached?

Thanks in advance!

gabbym
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:00 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby gabbym » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:42 pm

Thank you for taking the time to make this for us!

Michael Nirula
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:27 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Michael Nirula » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:54 pm

Can someone explain 21 aka why is the oxidation state in poryphorin +2?

Kaylee Kang 1G
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Kaylee Kang 1G » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:57 pm

Thank you SO MUCH!!

Alan Chang
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:29 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Alan Chang » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:08 pm

Which HW question is question 17 similar to?

marg44
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby marg44 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:21 pm

Can someone explain 41c? I'm confused as to why the nitrogen with the lone pair can accept the proton but not the oxygen.

bonnie_schmitz_1F
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby bonnie_schmitz_1F » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:44 pm

I think I understand the basis of how to do number 34, but I keep getting a pH of 2.10. Did anyone else make the error same/know what my error is?

Madelyn Cearlock
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:19 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Madelyn Cearlock » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:58 pm

Can someone please explain why in number 21 the oxidation number for iron is 2+?

Madelyn Cearlock
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:19 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Madelyn Cearlock » Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:27 pm

Can someone please explain number 28?

Ashley Odibo Dis3E
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:03 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Ashley Odibo Dis3E » Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:33 pm

What is a porphyrin ligand and will we be asked about ligands like this on the test?

Ashley Odibo Dis3E
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:03 am

Re: FINAL PRACTICE - Lyndon's Churro Review Session

Postby Ashley Odibo Dis3E » Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:47 pm

Joussie Camacho 4I wrote:
Leslie Cheng 4B wrote:On question 21, can someone explain why Fe has an oxidation state of +2? I get that this is because of the nitrogens, but how do the nitrogens come to have a charge of -2? I was trying to calculate the formal charge but kept getting a positive charge on the nitrogens, not a negative charge.


This is because we are told that the overall charge of the molecule is neutral. So if the nitrogens all have a charge of -2, then Fe has to have a charge of +2 in order for the overall charge to be 0. In order to find the charge of the nitrogen ligand, you have to look at each nitrogen when it is not bound to Fe (so you replace each n-Fe bond with a lone pair) and also fill in the rest of the lone pair necessary for each nitrogen to have a full octet (again, while unbound). Once you do this, you can find the formal charge of each nitrogen. There are 4 nitrogens, 2 of them had two pairs of lone pair electrons and 2 single bonds, so those had a formal charge of -1 (5-6 = -1) each, and the other two nitrogens had one pair of lone electrons and one single bond and one double bond, so those had a formal charge of 0 (5-5 = 0). The whole ring around Fe is 1 single ligand because it's all connected, so if we add all of the nitrogen charges together, the charge of the ligand is -2.

This is really hard to explain without the picture but I hope it helped somehow!


Thank's for your explanation, I was stuck on this for a while before


Return to “Administrative Questions and Class Announcements”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests