central atom
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 12:16 am
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:16 am
Re: central atom
yes! If it's possible, you're going to want the charges to be on the surrounding atoms rather than the central atom. I honestly couldn't tell you exactly why it's better, but it's better to not have a localized charge.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:16 am
Re: central atom
You would want the formal charge on the central atom to be closer to zero because its supposed to be the least electronegative.
Re: central atom
Yes! If the formal charge of the central atom is zero, the central atom is in a stable state.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 12:16 am
Re: central atom
yes, ideally the central atom should have a formal charge of zero to create the most stable lewis structure.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:15 am
Re: central atom
you would want the central atom to have the lowest possible formal charge. It is better for outside atoms to carry the charge than the central atom.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:15 am
Re: central atom
yes! I think that it is better to have the charge on the most electronegative atom, such as oxygen
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:17 am
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:17 am
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 12:17 am
Re: central atom
APatel_4A wrote:How do we know what the central atom should be?
The central atom is usually the least electronegative one.
Re: central atom
Yes, when drawing a lewis structure, the optimal structure will have a central atom with formal charge 0. It would be ideal for all of the atoms to have a formal charge of 0, but since this is not always possible your main concern should be to make the central atom have a formal charge of 0.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 12:17 am
Re: central atom
The central atom should be the most electronegative and while creating Lewis Structures, you want the formal charge to be as close to 0 as possible. You may need to change/add bonds such as by adding double bonds to fulfill that formal charge, it just depends on the compound given.
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2019 12:16 am
Re: central atom
APatel_4A wrote:How do we know what the central atom should be?
It is the least electronegative atom
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2019 12:16 am
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:15 am
Re: central atom
Yes, we want to make it so that the central atom has a formal charge of zero, or as close to zero as it can get - that would be the ideal situation.
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:17 am
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:16 am
Re: central atom
Yes, ideally the central atom should have a formal charge of 0. This is because we want the central atom to be the least electronegative atom of the molecule.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:15 am
Re: central atom
What do you do for exceptions? Such as in an atom consisting of N and O, which would be the central atom? O technically has the lower ionization energy than N. Does the number of desired bonds matter when considering the central atom more than the electronegativity?
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 12:17 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: central atom
Daniel Yu 1I wrote:What do you do for exceptions? Such as in an atom consisting of N and O, which would be the central atom? O technically has the lower ionization energy than N. Does the number of desired bonds matter when considering the central atom more than the electronegativity?
I believe the atom with the lower ionization energy still should be the central atom.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:21 am
Re: central atom
Yes, you always want the most formal charges to be zero in any way that is possible.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:18 am
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:16 am
Re: central atom
Alfred Barrion 3E wrote:You would want the formal charge on the central atom to be closer to zero because its supposed to be the least electronegative.
this confuses me bc in our discussion, our TA gave the example of PCl5, which has a -1 charge. The lewis structure has the P in the middle with a formal charge of -1, but that conflicts with the general rule of wanted the charge to be delocalized. Why?
Return to “Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests