Problem 3F10 b
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:17 am
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:17 am
Re: Problem 3F10 b
Daniel Martinez 1k wrote:Si2F2
Is this due to the shape? because Si2F2 would have a more linear structure, compared with a round structure of SiF4, and higher surface area makes for higher intermolecular forces, specifically London Dispersion Forces.
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:18 am
Re: Problem 3F10 b
Sydney Myers 4H wrote:Daniel Martinez 1k wrote:Si2F2
Is this due to the shape? because Si2F2 would have a more linear structure, compared with a round structure of SiF4, and higher surface area makes for higher intermolecular forces, specifically London Dispersion Forces.
I believe this question is dependent on polarity, no shape for size.
Re: Problem 3F10 b
Because SiF4 is a nonpolar molecule, it is only capable of having induced dipole-induced dipole bonds (London Forces). Si2F2, on the other hand, is a polar molecule--which you can determine from drawing the lewis structure and examining its molecular geometry/shape--which means it is capable of having dipole-dipole bonds which are stronger than London Forces, meaning that Si2F2 has the stronger IMFs.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:17 am
Re: Problem 3F10 b
Si2F2 has stronger intermolecular forces because it is more polar. SiF4 is non polar.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 12:18 am
Re: Problem 3F10 b
Because SiF4 is nonpolar, it has lower intermolecular forces than Si2F2 which is polar.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests