E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:17 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
When are we supposed to use E=hv, and when are we supposed to use E=1/2mv^2? Is E=1/2mv^2 only used for electrons, or can either be used? I am having some trouble for certain problems because I think I am using the wrong equation.Thanks!
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:02 pm
Re: E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
You are suppose to use E=hv with protons because they do not have mass thus the m is missing from the equation. While for E=1/2mv^2 is used for electrons or anything else that has mass and most of the time in the problem they either give you the velocity or the mass which is a huge giveaway to which equation to use. Hope this was helpful!
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:58 pm
Re: E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
Hi,
I just saw this on another post so I will reiterate what they said. "E=hv and c=frequency x wavelength are equations that only work for massless matter(i.e. electromagnetic radiation/photons). Anything with mass, so electrons, protons, everyday objects, abide by classical mechanics, 1/2mv^2 for kinetic energy, and de broglie's for wavelength." I figured I'd just share this to you in case you didn't see it.
I just saw this on another post so I will reiterate what they said. "E=hv and c=frequency x wavelength are equations that only work for massless matter(i.e. electromagnetic radiation/photons). Anything with mass, so electrons, protons, everyday objects, abide by classical mechanics, 1/2mv^2 for kinetic energy, and de broglie's for wavelength." I figured I'd just share this to you in case you didn't see it.
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:39 pm
Re: E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
Claire_Kim_2F wrote:You are suppose to use E=hv with protons because they do not have mass thus the m is missing from the equation. While for E=1/2mv^2 is used for electrons or anything else that has mass and most of the time in the problem they either give you the velocity or the mass which is a huge giveaway to which equation to use. Hope this was helpful!
This is extremely helpful, thank you!
Re: E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
Claire_Kim_2F wrote:You are suppose to use E=hv with protons because they do not have mass thus the m is missing from the equation. While for E=1/2mv^2 is used for electrons or anything else that has mass and most of the time in the problem they either give you the velocity or the mass which is a huge giveaway to which equation to use. Hope this was helpful!
I think most of us know, but just to clarify in case it confuses anyone: you use it with photons and not protons; protons have mass but photons do not.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:04 pm
Re: E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
darchen3G wrote:Claire_Kim_2F wrote:You are suppose to use E=hv with protons because they do not have mass thus the m is missing from the equation. While for E=1/2mv^2 is used for electrons or anything else that has mass and most of the time in the problem they either give you the velocity or the mass which is a huge giveaway to which equation to use. Hope this was helpful!
I think most of us know, but just to clarify in case it confuses anyone: you use it with photons and not protons; protons have mass but photons do not.
Thank you this was very helpful. With all these new terms it is helpful to simplify things in this way!
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:33 pm
Re: E=hv vs. E=1/2mv^2
E=hv is used when you are trying to find wavelength, frequency, and energy of a photon. 1/2 mv^2 is going to be used when were dealing with electrons that have ejected from an atom as a result of a photon. I think you can do this with any object as well. Maybe not idk.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests