Sapling Number 5
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:51 pm
Sapling Number 5
The Kb for an amine is 5.136×10−5. What percentage of the amine is protonated if the pH of a solution of the amine is 9.376 ? Assume that all OH− came from the reaction of B with H2O.
How do I find the initial B concentration in this problem? I have been getting answers that have been off.
How do I find the initial B concentration in this problem? I have been getting answers that have been off.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Re: Sapling Number 5
To find the initial B concentration, you have to add the concentration of BH+ to B.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:20 am
Re: Sapling Number 5
Hello, here is how I would approach this problem:
1) List out what is given first, which is the Kb and pH.
2) Use the pH to find pOH.
3) Then, you should use the pOH to find the initial concentration of products by taking the inverse of a logarithm. This operation is 10 to the power of the negative pOH.
4) You should set up a Kb concentration with products/reactants with the initial value that you are looking for as X.
Then, it is as simple as plugging in the numbers and solving. I hope this was helpful!
1) List out what is given first, which is the Kb and pH.
2) Use the pH to find pOH.
3) Then, you should use the pOH to find the initial concentration of products by taking the inverse of a logarithm. This operation is 10 to the power of the negative pOH.
4) You should set up a Kb concentration with products/reactants with the initial value that you are looking for as X.
Then, it is as simple as plugging in the numbers and solving. I hope this was helpful!
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 12:20 am
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:38 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Sapling Number 5
I was stuck on this question for so long and then I realized I used e instead of 10... :/
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 12:15 am
Re: Sapling Number 5
I think you have been getting the correct answer you just forget to add [OH-] with [B], I was doing that and getting wrong answer
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:34 pm
Re: Sapling Number 5
This question was pretty confusing to me as well, but as stated above, adding [BH+] to [B] should net you the right answer
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:46 pm
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2021 12:09 pm
Re: Sapling Number 5
Kandyce Lance 3E wrote:For this problem, are [OH-] and [BH+] interchangeable ?
Yes, since it's a monoprotic reaction, both values taken in this problem are the same. Although it would probably be good form to use [OH-] and [BH+] properly, just to lessen the chances of messing up in the future when they're not.
Re: Sapling Number 5
This one is tricky because you have a lot of moving parts. But basically, if you can lockdown the BH+ value, you just add that to B.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:40 pm
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:45 pm
Re: Sapling Number 5
Yeprem wrote:I completely forgot to add [B] with [BH+] to find the [B] formal:(
Thank you
Thanks for clarifying this! I have been stuck on this for so long. This helped make it clear what B formal is!
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:35 pm
Re: Sapling Number 5
I first calculate concentration of OH and BH using the given pH and inverse log. I set these values as final concentrations for OH and BH on my ice chart and B reactant is x-the final concentration of OH. I then would solve for x after setting up my expression for kb.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Re: Sapling Number 5
Kandyce Lance 3E wrote:For this problem, are [OH-] and [BH+] interchangeable ?
I wouldn't describe them as interchangeable. You can use either value because for every mole of OH- produced, there's exactly one mole of BH+ produced, making them equal to each other.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:42 pm
Re: Sapling Number 5
To find the initial [B], you can add the equilibrium [B] with the x you used for the ICE table.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 12:15 am
Re: Sapling Number 5
I think it's just the inverse of an ICE table.
I would asume that you've already found the concentration of OH-, let's say it's 10. Since for one mole of OH-, BH+ is produced, BH+ also has a concentration of 10.
Therefore, for the ICE table, you'll get:
BOH OH- BH+
I ? 0 0
C ? ? ?
E ? 10 10
Now since you know that since the initial concentration of OH- and BH- is 10, you would get that the concentration of OH- and BH+ as added 10. This means that BOH's concentration would decrease by 10. Consequently, the end result of BOH would be it's initial value minus 10.
Now the ICE table looks like this:
BOH OH- BH+
I ? 0 0
C -10 10 10
E ?-10 10 10
Now that you've got all the end values and the K, you can list an equation and solve out what ? is
I would asume that you've already found the concentration of OH-, let's say it's 10. Since for one mole of OH-, BH+ is produced, BH+ also has a concentration of 10.
Therefore, for the ICE table, you'll get:
BOH OH- BH+
I ? 0 0
C ? ? ?
E ? 10 10
Now since you know that since the initial concentration of OH- and BH- is 10, you would get that the concentration of OH- and BH+ as added 10. This means that BOH's concentration would decrease by 10. Consequently, the end result of BOH would be it's initial value minus 10.
Now the ICE table looks like this:
BOH OH- BH+
I ? 0 0
C -10 10 10
E ?-10 10 10
Now that you've got all the end values and the K, you can list an equation and solve out what ? is
Return to “Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests