Empirical Coefficients [ENDORSED]
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am
- Been upvoted: 2 times
Empirical Coefficients
Sometimes when I solve for the empirical formula I get moles like 3.1 or 2.9. Looking at the answers, I found out that rounds to 3. After what decimal digit (3.15 or 3.2) should I multiply all the moles by a constant to get better whole numbers?
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
Typically, you will get numbers that are very close to a whole number such as 1.97 or 3.08 which you would round to 2 and 3. In many of the problems I have done so far that I've had to multiply in order to get a whole number, I've gotten numbers like 2.67, 1.33 and 3.75 which can easily be multiplied to get a whole number (2.67 x 3, 1.33 x 3, 3.75 x 4).
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:00 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Empirical Coefficients [ENDORSED]
Generally, anything that doesn't seem like it can be easily multiplied into another whole number (ex: 1.5 x 2, 2.67 x 3) can be easily rounded to its nearest integer. This usually just happens due to rounding errors with sig figs so I wouldn't worry too much. They are almost always apparent what they should round to.
Re: Empirical Coefficients
Yeah that's what I learned in chemistry class, you round down when it's bellow 1.3, and round up when it's 1.8, but when its 1.5 multiply by 2, and when its 1.6 multiply by 3.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:03 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
When the answer you acquire is close to a whole number such as 2.9 it is better to round up to 3 and not having to multiple by another number as it already is a whole number.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Empirical Coefficients
As far as I know, if the number is within .1 from a whole number than you would just round to that whole number. However if its more than that you would need to multiply it by a number to get it to a whole number. So if it is .25 than you would multiply by 4 or if its .5 you would multiply by 2 and etc.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:00 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
Yeah I agree. You mainly want to round when you get a number ending in like .5, .333, .666. etc. Other then that, if the number is below .5 in the tens place then round down and if above, round up.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
Generally I would round to the nearest whole number if its +/- 0.1 from a whole number. Often times numbers are off a little due to rounding errors.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
From what I learned you round up when its bigger than .5 and round down when its smaller than .5
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
If the answer is .1 away from a whole number, round accordingly. If it isn't then multiply all mole ratios so they are close enough to whole numbers. For example, if one ratio is 2.25, multiply all the ratios by 4 to get whole numbers.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
nanditasundarapandian1D wrote:From what I learned you round up when its bigger than .5 and round down when its smaller than .5
but what if the last digit is exactly 5?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am
Re: Empirical Coefficients
yifeiwang wrote:nanditasundarapandian1D wrote:From what I learned you round up when its bigger than .5 and round down when its smaller than .5
but what if the last digit is exactly 5?
When we discussed rounding in my discussion section, we talked about how if it's exactly .5, you would round to the nearest even number, so if it was 3.25, you would round to 3.2, and if it was 3.35, you would round to 3.4!
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am
- Been upvoted: 2 times
Return to “Empirical & Molecular Formulas”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests