In 29a, why is the answer hexacyanoferrate (II) ion instead of hexacyanidoferrate (II) ion? I thought that since cyanide had an -ide ending it would be converted to -ido.
Thank you!
Ch. 17 Problem 29a [ENDORSED]
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 23858
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
- Has upvoted: 1253 times
Re: Ch. 17 Problem 29a [ENDORSED]
The older naming convention would use "cyano" and the newest IUPAC naming rules use "cyanido." In this case the text has opted to provide a solution in the old naming convention. You should be familiar with both and both will be acceptable on any exams.
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am
Re: Ch. 17 Problem 29a
It changes to ferrate because the "ate" indicates that the overall charge of the complex is negative. Fe originally comes from the latin ferrum and that's where the ate is added onto.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Ch. 17 Problem 29a
the suffix -ate indicates that the compound has a negative charge and ferr is from iron so ferrate shows that the iron compound is negative
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests