Can someone explain how to get the order of [B]?
I got exact numbers for [A] and [C] but I keep getting decimal points for [B].
HW 15.19a
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:00 am
Re: HW 15.19a
For [B], I used the first and third experiment since [B] is the only thing that changes then. So I write the third one over the first one:
So, 3.02/1.25 = 2.416
Also, 50.8/8.7 = 5.839
I know that the order for [B] has to be a whole number so like 2 or 3. So I tried squaring 2.416 and I got 5.837. That's close enough to 5.839 so it's 2.
So, 3.02/1.25 = 2.416
Also, 50.8/8.7 = 5.839
I know that the order for [B] has to be a whole number so like 2 or 3. So I tried squaring 2.416 and I got 5.837. That's close enough to 5.839 so it's 2.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:00 am
Re: HW 15.19a
Also I tried doing the first one over the third one and I also got 2 so it doesn't matter which one goes on top and which one is on the bottom. I just got decimals when I put the small one on top but the same answer - second order.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am
Re: HW 15.19a
Use log rules if the order is not obvious from observation. For this you get something like 2.416^b = 5.8 as said by the person above. use the log power rule by taking the log of both sides; this takes b down
getting b*log2.416 = log 5.8
solving for b should give a number very close to 2 indicating second order
getting b*log2.416 = log 5.8
solving for b should give a number very close to 2 indicating second order
Return to “Kinetics vs. Thermodynamics Controlling a Reaction”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests