Scientific notation [ENDORSED]
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:03 am
Scientific notation
Should we always answer in scientific notation? or simply maintaining sig figs is enough?
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:03 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Scientific notation [ENDORSED]
Sig figs should be enough, but for really small or really large numbers I would use scientific notation to be concise.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2018 3:00 am
Re: Scientific notation
Hi Kalsuda,
I do not think that there is heavy emphasis on neither sig figs or scientific notation this quarter. Personally, I am uncomfortable working with scientific notation, so I will oftentimes convert numbers that are given to me in scientific notation into decimals and change them back for my end result. I think that it is okay to answer with either decimals or sig figs. My TA recommended keeping no more than 3 numbers after the decimal point in your response. It could get confusing to have super long, untruncated answers. The most important part about these calculations is that you are attempting to be as accurate as possible.
I do not think that there is heavy emphasis on neither sig figs or scientific notation this quarter. Personally, I am uncomfortable working with scientific notation, so I will oftentimes convert numbers that are given to me in scientific notation into decimals and change them back for my end result. I think that it is okay to answer with either decimals or sig figs. My TA recommended keeping no more than 3 numbers after the decimal point in your response. It could get confusing to have super long, untruncated answers. The most important part about these calculations is that you are attempting to be as accurate as possible.
Re: Scientific notation
Hi,
Professor Lavelle stated that significant figures would not be a concern for the purposes of Chem 14A; it isn't something to be concerned with generally. That said, I advise that you keep your final answer limited, like what Gianna's TA said, and in addition, I would avoid rounding/simplifying until the end of the problem if possible so you don't compromise accuracy.
Best,
Jack
Professor Lavelle stated that significant figures would not be a concern for the purposes of Chem 14A; it isn't something to be concerned with generally. That said, I advise that you keep your final answer limited, like what Gianna's TA said, and in addition, I would avoid rounding/simplifying until the end of the problem if possible so you don't compromise accuracy.
Best,
Jack
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:02 am
Re: Scientific notation
In class, he also mentioned how we wouldn't get negatively impacted for the quizzes if we weren't to follow sig figs. I assume this may also apply to tests as well?
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:03 am
Re: Scientific notation
I think either is fine, but generally in chemistry, scientific notation is used. However, Lavelle did mention that significant figures do not matter in this course.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:03 am
Re: Scientific notation
Hello,
You never have to answer in scientific notation unless it is specifically stated in the question. It is a personal preference, because sometimes people rather write .0000005 as 5x10^-7 just because it is easier. Sig figs are an important concept and you should always use them!
You never have to answer in scientific notation unless it is specifically stated in the question. It is a personal preference, because sometimes people rather write .0000005 as 5x10^-7 just because it is easier. Sig figs are an important concept and you should always use them!
Re: Scientific notation
for your final answer, scientific notation is best because it makes the size/scale of your result clear, however it is not necessary in your calculations if you prefer doing math with large numbers/decimals
Return to “Significant Figures”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests