2 Substituents on a Ring

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Mackenzie Sober 2E
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:00 am

2 Substituents on a Ring

Postby Mackenzie Sober 2E » Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:13 pm

The course reader says for 2 Substituents on a ring, if the substituent numbers are the same, the 1st named group gets the lower number. If there are only 2 substituents, won't they always have the same number? If this is not correct, can someone please give an example of when they would not have the same number.

Alex Dib 4H
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:57 pm

Re: 2 Substituents on a Ring

Postby Alex Dib 4H » Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:46 pm

An example of this would be with, lets say, a cyclohexane with a methyl on the left lower carbon and an ethyl on the right upper carbon. You can either number this as 4-ethyl-1-methylcyclohexane, giving a 1 to the methyl and giving a 4 to the ethyl , or you can alternatively name it 1-ethyl-4-methylcyclohexane giving a 1 to the ethyl and a 4 to the methyl. In both cases, the substituent numbers are the same (1 and 4), so what you have to do is assign the lower number to the first named substituent, in this case ethyl because of alphabetical order. So the correct answer would be 1-ethyl-4-methylcyclohexane. Hope this helps.

Katie McCombs 3G
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:57 pm

Re: 2 Substituents on a Ring

Postby Katie McCombs 3G » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:48 pm

Since it is in a ring structure, you are correct that the number will always be the same. Therefore it is the common practice of a ring with 2 substituents to give the first named substituent the lower number.


Return to “*Cycloalkenes”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests